Analysis and Interpretation of “Company of Wolves”

Angela Carter The political party of Wolves (1979, excerpt) Men argon powerful, strong, dominant. provided what be wo custodys strengths? This question was widely discussed in the novel seventies during the wo mens liberation movement. Women either all over the world were fighting for their rights, and this inspi chromatic female person authors to put their thoughts into stories. Women could be military personnelipulative, deceiving. They could control men when they wanted to. So why were the men in control of the world?By rewriting Little Red equitation clod, Angela Carter turns the norms of the fairytale upside down, and thereby shows the development in contemporary society. In The Company of Wolves, a spring chicken misfire whips the most manly of all creatures the were fair sex chaser. The short bill is chronological and is told by an omniscient third person vote counter with a have narrative soundChildren do non stay preadolescent for coarse in this savage rustic(p. 22). This gives the reader an insight in the huntsmans thoughts as well as the young ladys, and we get an apprehension of the decisions taken by the reference books.The short story has intertextuality, as its a rewriting of the fairytale Little Red Riding Hood, but its uncharacteristic as a fairytale as it does not give out with the usual once upon a quantify, and does not end with they lived happily eer after. Angela Carter has chosen to rewrite a story almost everyone knows to make her communicate easier to find out. still the language in the story is preferably formal. This makes it more difficult to understand properly, and it shows that Angela Carter wanted to address the story to the educated part of society.The formal language is to a fault a way of pointing out that women female genital organ actually write in a high level of language. The short storys saddle horse is midwinter in a forest. The winter embodies the dissimulation white, the color of n aturalness. The color white is utilize frequently in the story as well as the color rubicund to personalize the daughter. The white color symbolizes her sinlessness and the departure color represents a vainglorious woman, her fatality and female passion in line of work to her innocence and sensibility. The girl is the chief(prenominal) character in the story, as she undergoes a clear development from a young girl to a grown woman.She starts out as a young and innocent girl, coolly walking through the forest on her way to her grandmothers house. But as she meets the young huntsman, the man, the wolf, it starts snowing. The huntsman threatens her innocence symbolized with the prelude to a blizzard. At the end of the story, estimable as the girl has gone to bed with the huntsman, it wampum snowing (The blizzard died down, p. 27). The white snow, her innocence, has died down, and her innocence is lost forever. Angela Carter is using a woman as the hero in the story, which i s quite unusual for a fairytale.She was trying to block up away from the norms of the fairytale by allow the girl use her female strengths to beat the werewolf. She is deceiving and manipulating the werewolf, and ends up sleeping with the werewolf preferably of being eaten. The huntsman is Angela Carters symbol of masculinity. In this story men atomic number 18 shown as beasts, just like the huntsman. Hes a werewolf, hes hairy, hes carnivore bodied (p. 25). When the girl was walking through the forest, she comprehend the freezing howl of a wolf (p. 23), ( but she saw no house of a wolf at all, nor of a defenseless man, p. 23).By adding this, Angela Carter implies that a naked man and a wolf are the same thing, (and thereby she lets her thoughts as the author be apparent). The huntsman eats the grandmother. He is literally nutriment on women, just as Angela Carter indicates that men are feeding on women in society. Most of the women at that time were still cooking, cleanin g and winning care of the children at home singlehandedly, and could hold out to take care of their husband when he got back from work. Women were the unappreciated pillar of society. The color in red and white are the main symbols in the story.These colors are mentioned throughout the story ( her cheeks are an emblematic scarlet and white, p. 22). The first sentence starts with It is midwinter and the robin redbreast (p. 22), the midwinter is white and the robin is red. As mentioned earlier, red and white symbolizes the girls innocence, passion and femininity. Red is not solely used to symbolize the huntsmans lethality ( eyeball the size of saucers, saucers full of Greek fire, beastly phosphorescence, p. 25), (There was a faint pull of blood on his chin, p. 24), the girls red dress shows how the girl is equally lethal to the huntsman.By writing this story Angela Carter is focusing on womens strengths, such as how the girl uses purpose and untruth to beat the werewolf. She indicates that a woman can take a man into her mercy in any abandoned situation (even when hes about to eat you). But does Angela Carter really think manipulation and deception are strengths? Isnt this to display womens weakness, if these are their only strengths? Angela Carter uses the fairytale to catch the readers attention, and by do the girl succeed in manipulating with the werewolf, she dissociates herself from the sheer fairytales in which a man is the savior.Angela Carter shows men as beasts, stainlessly feeding slay of and toying with women, though they cant go for long without the love of a woman. Men are unintelligent as they just meet their feral instincts, and can be tricked by even the most innocent girl at any given time. But Angela Carter does not end up fine-looking the reader a positive variation of women either. They use manipulation and their female bodies to mislead men. This short story is Angela Carters contribution to the give-and-take of gender ro les in society at that time.Hvad har jeg gjort? Jeg har selvfolgelig rettet de fejl som du gjorde opm? rksom pa, og provet at fa teksten til at passe bedre til konklusionen. Egentligt er det mere konklusionen jeg har provet at tilpasse teksten, da jeg har sv? rt ved at udv? lge, hvilke dele af analysen der burde udelades. I et par af analysepunkterne har jeg uddybet, sa sammenh? ngen med konklusionen er mere klar. Jeg har provet at omskrive den del af analysen, hvor du var uenig i at jeg anklagede Angela Carter, hvilket jeg godt kan se, er at ga for langt.Tror jeg blev grebet af, at jeg folte at jeg havde fat i noget, og korte den lidt for langt ud. Jeg har detent holdt fast i pointen. Jeg har forsogt at uddybe hvorfor Angela Carter har valgt en alvidende 3. persons fort? ller, og rettet mine fordanskede udtryk. Du bad mig ogsa om at uddybe enkelte dele af analysen, og det har jeg provet at gore, dog uden at komme med en ny pointe som gar tabt i lobet af analysen. Jeg er i tvivl, o m det er bedst at skrive can not eller cant / shes eller she is, eller om det er ligegyldigt.